Class Actions

Lafayette & Kumagai represents clients including Shell Oil Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Viacom, Inc. in wage and hour class actions and regulatory rate class actions.

Class Actions – Representative Cases

Guyette, et al. v. Viacom, Inc., et al. – The firm was retained to try this case on behalf of Defendant Viacom after the Superior Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for class certification and after a failed mediation in which Plaintiff demanded more than $78 million.  In this consumer class action plaintiff sought entitlement to tax rebates accorded Viacom in connection with its cable television franchise.  The case settled three months later for $13 million.

Williams v. San Francisco Housing Authority – In a class action brought by Sidney Wolinsky of Disability Rights Advocates and Laurence Paradis of Miller, Starr & Regalia, handicapped individuals sued for discrimination and violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.  Lafayette & Kumagai was instrumental in resolving the matter without proceeding to costly litigation and without the San Francisco Housing Authority having to pay damages to each class member.

Wales, et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al. – Lafayette & Kumagai, partnering with Reed Smith, successfully defeated Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in June 2010, for a class in excess of 18,000 employees, some of whom Plaintiffs alleged were misclassified as managers.  The firms also defeated Plaintiffs’ joint employment claim under which Plaintiffs sought to hold Defendant liable for alleged violations regarding employees of other entities.

Ivy, et al. v. Jiffy Lube International Inc., et al. – Lafayette & Kumagai successfully defeated Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in August 2010, in Alameda County Superior Court.  Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant misclassified employees as managers.  Judge Steven A. Brick found that the evidence does not suggest that any misclassification was more than an isolated, sporadic incident and that common questions of law and fact do not predominate.

Labor Commissioner, et al. v. Advantica Restaurant Group, Inc., et al. – The firm was retained to represent Defendant Denny’s Inc. regarding a dispute with the California Department of Labor Standards Enforcement about whether or not Defendant’s vacation plan was a qualified ERISA plan and subject to California labor laws.  The matter was successfully resolved two months later.  Defendant had previously been represented by an out-of-state firm and another firm in California.  Lafayette & Kumagai was retained after Defendant’s attempt to collaterally attack California enforcement in another jurisdiction proved unsuccessful.

Conley, et al. v. PG&E – The firm was retained to try this misclassification case after Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification was granted.  Lafayette & Kumagai worked with co-counsel Ogletree Deakins in defending Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and negotiating a favorable settlement.

print version:

Section Menu

• Labor & Employment
• ERISA Litigation
• Commercial Litigation
• Environmental & Toxics
• Public Entity
• Trial Practice
• Appellate Practice
• Class Actions
• Representative Clients